The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the Chief Justice, with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the competent authority or file a grievance with the vigilance authority or Lokayukta.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
JAYANT MAHENDRA GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Jayant Mehta, Mr. Aman Varma & Ms. Smriti Churiwal, Advs.
versus
STATE OF NCT & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ramesh Singh, Standing Counsel with Mr. Chirayu Jain & Ms. Nikita Goyal, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to either approach the competent authority or file a statutory grievance before a vigilance authority like the Lokayukta.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
CHIEF JUSTICE
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
DECEMBER 14, 2018 ns
JAYANT MAHENDRA GUPTA
STATE OF NCT & ORS
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
