This petition challenged denial of permission to extend training due to illness. The Court dismissed the writ petition in limine, holding it hopelessly barred by delay and laches.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~23
versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr.Vijay Joshi with Mr.Sushil Kumar Pandey, Advs & Mr.Sang, AC/CISF.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI
O R D E R
W.P.(C) 8167/2018
page 1 of 3
on 10.10.2017, with a request to join the next batch for training, which could obviously not be considered favourably.
HIMA KOHLI, J
REKHA PALLI, J
AUGUST 06, 2018
sr
W.P.(C) 8167/2018
page 3 of 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a petition seeking revival of appointment offer barred by long delay and laches can be entertained.
Manish Kumar
Union of India & Ors
Hima Kohli
Rekha Palli
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
