The High Court of Delhi dismissed this writ petition seeking reinstatement by the CRPF, holding it hopelessly barred by delay and laches after eight years inactivity without valid explanation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12
Through: Mr. P.C. Mishra, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate with Mr. Dhruva, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI O R D E R % 03.08.2018
he had taken thereafter to approach the respondents, till he submitted a representation in the year 2018.
HIMA KOHLI, J
REKHA PALLI, J
AUGUST 03, 2018 ap/na W.P.(C) 8020/2018
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should entertain a writ petition for reinstatement in service filed after an inordinate delay of over eight years without sufficient explanation?
Whether the delay and laches bar the court from granting relief for reinstatement?
Sanjay Kumar Chauhan
Union of India
Hima Kohli
Rekha Palli
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
