Disposed
Global Enterprises v. Commissioner of Vat & Anr.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/8167/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~15
GLOBAL ENTERPRISES ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Suhail Anjum Siddiqui and Mr. M.A. Ansari, Advocates.
versus
COMMISSIONER OF VAT & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Siddharth Dutta and Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
O R D E R % 08.01.2018
Counsel for the parties state that refund claim has been processed and payment has been made.
In view of the aforesaid position, the writ petition has become infructuous and is accordingly disposed of, without any order as to costs.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.
JANUARY 08, 2018 MR/VKR
GLOBAL ENTERPRISES
COMMISSIONER OF VAT
Sanjiv Khanna
Chander Shekar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court