The High Court of Delhi fixed a writ petition challenging eviction proceedings under the Slum Act. The Competent Authority found the petitioner had alternative accommodation means. Counsel withdrew the petition while reserving rights for the civil court.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; application disposed of; contentions reserved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~36
MOHD MURSALEEN @ MUNNA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr M. K. Khan, Advocate.
versus
MOHD AFZAL ..... Respondent Through: Ms Mini Pushkdarna, Standing Counsel for DUSIB with Ms Swagata Bhuyan and Ms Shiva Pandey, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R
% 06.08.2018
CM No.31215/2018
W.P.(C) 8144/2018 & CM No.31214/2018
between the petitioner and respondent no.2.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
AUGUST 06, 2018 MK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner can challenge eviction proceedings on the ground of non-ownership by the respondent before the eviction proceedings are instituted.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
MOHD MURSALEEN @ MUNNA
MOHD AFZAL
VIBHU BAKHRU
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
