Petitioner sought to withdraw writ petition with liberty to file with better particulars; court allowed withdrawal and dismissed petition.
Application allowed; petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file with better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~41
RAVINDRA SHRIVASTAV & ANR ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr Praveen Kumar Mittal, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mrs Bharathi Raju, CGSC with Ms Sandhya, Advocates for -1 & R- 2/UOI.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % 03.08.2018
CM No.31061/2018
W.P.(C) 7644/2018
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
AUGUST 03, 2018 MK
RAVINDRA SHRIVASTAV
UNION OF INDIA
VIBHU BAKHRU
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
