Writ petition seeking direction to reconsider petitioner's representation claiming discrimination in promotion. Court disposed of petition directing respondent to reconsider specific paragraphs of representation within four weeks.
Directed respondent to reconsider the representation dated 25.06.2016 within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
versus
OFFICE OF THE DISST. AND SESSIONS JUDGE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel with Mr. N.K. Singh, Ms.Palak Rohmetra and Ms. Aarushi, Advocates for D& SJ.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT O R D E R % 03.12.2018
punished with one increment without cumulative effect.
6. In the said representation, it is also stated that Sh. Rajender Kumar was also considered who is presently at Saket Court Complex.
7. In the said representation, it is further stated that Sh. Rajender Kumar who is presently posted at Saket Court Complex was imposed with penalty of withholding his annual increments for 5 years with cumulative effect in file no. F. 1029/Vig. by Sh. S. N. Dhingra, ld. D&SJ, Delhi, despite his case was considered for promotion.
8. Counsel for the petitioner submits that there is a total discrimination against the petitioner whereas in similar circumstances, the other persons mentioned above has been considered for promotion but the petitioner has not been considered.
9. Keeping in view the averments made in the petition and submissions of the counsel for the parties, I hereby dispose of the present petition directing the respondent to consider the representation dated 25.06.2016 which is at page 11 and 12 of the present petition within four weeks from the receipt of this order.
10. The decision would be reasoned and by dealing with specifically paras 2 and 5 of the representation.
11. The decision taken shall be communicated to the petitioner within one week, thereafter, in writing.
12. The petition is accordingly disposed of. Dasti.
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J
DECEMBER 03, 2018/ rd
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be directed to reconsider its earlier rejection of the petitioner's representation regarding promotion discrimination.
Whether the petitioner claims discrimination in promotion consideration compared to other officers.
SH. HARI OM
OFFICE OF THE DISTT. AND SESSIONS JUDGE
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
