The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition after representing that the underlying issue was settled out of court. The court permitted the withdrawal.
Permission was granted to withdraw the petition; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
MAHARAJA AGRASAIN NURSERY SCHOOL AND ANR.
..... Petitioners
Through Mr.Kamal Gupta, Adv. with Ms.Pragya Agrawal, Adv.
versus
MRS. DEEPIKA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Adv. with Mr.Bhanu Gupta, Adv. for DoE. Mr.Jamal Akhtar, Adv. for R-2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT O R D E R % 04.12.2018
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the issue in the present petition has been settled out of the Court, thus, seeking permission to withdraw the said petition.
Permission is granted.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J
DECEMBER 04, 2018 ab
MAHARAJA AGRASAIN NURSERY SCHOOL
MRS. DEEPIKA
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
