Veer Kumar v. Delhi University
Case brief
What is this about?
Delhi University Court summarily disposed of the petition as infructuous since the petitioner had been declared passed in the 'Indian Political Thought' paper.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
$~7
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(C) 7940/2017 VEER KUMAR ..... Petitioner
- Through None.
- versus
DELHI UNIVERSITY ..... Respondent Through Mr. Mohinder J.S Rupal with Ms. Somita Rai, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI
- O R D E R
- % 04.01.2018
None appears for the petitioner. However, Mr. Mohinder J.S Rupal, learned counsel for the respondent/Delhi University submits that the respondent has, vide notification dated 03.11.2017, declared the result of the petitioner in the paper of ‘Indian Political Thought’ (code-A113), B.A(Hons) Political Science Part I and he has been declared as pass in the same. He therefore submits that the writ petition has become infructuous as the only prayer for the petitioner was for declaration of his result in the aforesaid paper. It appears that, for this reason, none is present for the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Veer Kumar
- respondent
Delhi University
Coram
Rekha Palli
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court