The petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition in view of a public notice. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn along with a pending application. Dasti dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
ROHINI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY REGD. ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. R.K. Saini, Advocate.
versus
D.D.A. & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Arun Birbal, Advocate for DDA
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the public notice dated 12.12.2017, he wishes to withdraw the present writ petition and he would approach the respondents in accordance with the public notice.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn alongwith pending application.
Dasti.
REKHA PALLI, J
JANUARY 04, 2018 bh
Rohini Educational Society Regd.
D.D.A. & ORS.
Rekha Palli
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
