This order adjourned a writ petition to allow the petitioner to make a representation to Reserve Bank of India before considering the matter further.
Liberty to make representation to RBI; liberty to approach court if aggrieved by RBI's view.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12
MANISH GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through : Ms. K.R. Chitra, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Aditya Madaan, Adv. for Mr. Jasmeet Singh, CGSC for R-1.
Mr. Rajiv Kapur, Adv. for R-2. Mr. Sanjay Gupta, Mr. Ateev Mathur, Ms. Jagriti Ahuja and Mr. Amul Sharma, Advs. For R-3
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R % 27.07.2018
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
JULY 27, 2018/ mk
MANISH GUPTA
UNION OF INDIA
C. HARI SHANKAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
