Petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to initiate proceedings. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and disposed of the pending application.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings; pending application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11
HIMALAYA COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr Alok Krishna and Mr Mayank, Advocates.
versus
BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr Dipak Kumar Jena, Ms Minakshi Ghose and Mr Jaladhar Das, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R
% 02.08.2018
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
AUGUST 02, 2018 MK
Himalaya Communications Limited
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited
Vibhu Bakharu
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
