This single-paragraph order dismissed a writ petition challenging the maintainability of a challenge regarding illegal construction on public land, holding such protection is not maintainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
INSHA MILIAT ASSOCIATES (REGD) ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. B. Singh, Adv.
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ... Respondents Through : Mr. Naushad Ahmad Khan, ASC (Civil), GNCTD with Mr. Devesh Dubey, Adv. for R-1&2. Mr. Arjun Pant, Adv. for R- 3. Mr. G.D. Mishra, St. Counsel for R-4.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R % 23.07.2018
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
JULY 23, 2018/ mk
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking protection of illegal and unauthorized construction on public land is maintainable.
Whether the High Court should grant protection to the petitioner for construction on public land.
INSHA MILIAT ASSOCIATES (REGD)
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
C.HARI SHANKAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
