The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request.
Leave to withdraw the writ petition permitted and the petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~18
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MISS AISHWARYA NANDA (A MINOR) ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Saurabh Suman Sinha, Mr. Anirudh Singh and Mr. Aditya Dev Triguna, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ... Respondents Through : Mr. Sandeep mahapatra, Advocate for R-1 Mr. Amit Bansal and Ms. Seema Dolo, Advocates for R-2 and 3, CBSE
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R % 23.07.2018
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
JULY 23, 2018/rk/dsn
Miss Aishwarya Nanda
Union of India
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
