Petitioner challenged an order of the Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act despite an alternative remedy. Counsel withdrew the petition, and the court dismissed it as withdrawn with liberty to avail alternative remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~25
Through: Mr.Puneet Saini, Advocate.
versus
JAI KISHAN AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Krishan Kumar Pandey, Advocate for R-1.
Ms.Deboshree Mukherjee, Advocate for Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, ASC for GNCTD for R- 2 & R-3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
VINOD GOEL, J. (ORAL)
Page 1 of 2
W.P. (C) 7354/2016
(VINOD GOEL)
JUDGE
APRIL 06, 2018
“shailendra”
Page 2 of 2
W.P. (C) 7354/2016
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Thai Airways International Public Company Ltd. Vs. Gurvinder SinghReferred¶12
Thai Airways International Public Company Ltd. Vs. Gurvinder Singh, 2018 LLR 390
GAUTAM MEHTA
JAI KISHAN AND ORS
VINOD GOEL
VINOD GOEL
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
