This order permits the withdrawal of W.P.(C) 7253/2017 filed by Shiv Polymers, leaving the question of law open while dismissing the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Santosh Kumar Pandey, Adv. for UOI. Mr.Sanjeev Narula with Mr.Abhishek Ghai, Adv. for Customs. Mr.Aditya Singla, Sr. Standing Counsel for R-3. Mr.Pratap Singh and Mr.Navneet Tripathi, Advs. for R-4.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR O R D E R % 18.07.2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition but the question of law may be left open.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.
JULY 18, 2018 neelam
Shiv Polymers
Union of India
Sanjiv Khanna
Chander Shekhar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
