Principal Commissioner of Income Tax v. Meeta Gutgutia
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
versus
MEETA GUTGUTIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
O R D E R % 17.07.2018
In view of the low tax effect and in terms of Circular No. 3/2018 dated 11th July, 2018, counsel for the Revenue/appellant states that they are not pressing the present appeal and the same may be disposed of without answering the question of law.
Taking the statement on record, the appeal is disposed of without answering the question of law.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.
JULY 17, 2018 MR/NA
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
MEETA GUTGUTIA
SANJIV KHANNA
CHANDER SHEKHAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court