Writ petition filed against notification prohibiting fixed dose combination of Etodolac+Paracetamol. Court dismissed petition as it was disposed of per Supreme Court judgment dated 15th December 2017 regarding rationality and safety challenges to similar fixed dose combinations.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~23
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
..... Petitioners Through : Mr. Arvind Kumar, Ms. Purti Marwaha and Mr. C.S. Chauhan, Advs.
WANBURY LIMITED AND ANR
versus
UNION OF INDIA
..... Respondent Through : Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for R-UOI
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R % 10.04.2018
pg. 1 of 2
Ors. These appeals and transfer petitions relating to similar challenges have been decided by a judgment dated 15th December, 2017 by the Supreme Court inter alia directing as follows :
“39. Insofar as the status quo, obtaining as on today, is concerned, that will continue in all cases (including the 5 FDCs which are not the subject matter of stay orders already made) until the Central Government issues fresh notifications in this behalf.”
Dasti to parties.
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
APRIL 10, 2018/ kr
pg. 2 of 2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Wanbury Limited
Union of India
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
