The Court declined to interfere with the impugned judgment regarding the redrawing of promotion lists after a recent Supreme Court order directed a Constitution Bench hearing and denied interim relief.
Liberty granted to petitioners to approach the Supreme Court for appropriate relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified Signed By:RAM DATT Signing Date:15.10.2024 16:42 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file an d no page is missing.
apphcafonw.th the samedirectionsas had been issuedto the respondentsin he case ofRamPhejOada,^to redrawthe promotionallists/panels • alreadyissued,with all consequentialbenefitsexceptfor any back wages mthe circumstancesofthe case.
P
HIMAJCQHLI,j
JULY10,2018/na REKHWiALLI,J W.P.(C) 7051/2018 / / Paie^of2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can interfere in the impugned judgment given the Supreme Court directive to constitute a Constitution Bench and deny interim relief.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Madhya PradeshReferred¶4
State of Madhya Pradesh & Others vs [Civil Appeals No.4562-4564 of 2017] dated 14.11.2017
M. NasarajReferred¶4
M. Nasaraj (Supra)
Ram Phej OadaReferred¶2
Ram Phej Oada case
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioners
Respondents (to be identified by Court in case of Ram Phej Oada)
Rekhwali
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
