Allowed

Const. Veramani T v. Ministry of Home Affairs & Ors.

Delhi HC9 Jul 2018W.P.(C)/4803/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Delhi, in a writ petition, granted liberty to a petitioner, an ex-force personnel with schizophrenia, to submit medical documents to support his service appeal dismissed as time-barred. The 2017 quash order was set aside, and a fresh hearing was mandated within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Quashed the order dated 01.06.2017; granted liberty to submit medical documents within four weeks; Appellate Authority to pass a fresh speaking order on merits within eight weeks.

Const. Veramani T Vs Ministry of Home Affairs… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~5.

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(C) 4803/2018 and CM APPL. 18480/2018

¶4

CONST. VERAMANI T ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Asit Kumar Roy, Advocate.

¶5

versus

¶6

MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Satyendra Kumar and Mr. Jitendra Kumar, Advocates.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI O R D E R % 09.07.2018

¶8

The petitioner, an ex-force personnel, who was dismissed from the service by the respondents/BSF, is aggrieved by his removal order dated 21.03.2014 as also by the dismissal of his appeal vide order dated 17.06.2017, on the ground of delay and laches .

¶9

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was removed from service on 21.03.2014 and immediately thereafter, he had developed schizophrenia. In the meantime, the respondents did not supply him the entire records of the Summary Security Force Court till 10.10.2014, though he had applied for the same on 27.03.2014. Finally, when the petitioner did file an appeal on 03.05.2017, the same was dismissed by the Appellate Authority vide order dated 01.06.2017 on the ground of delay and laches .

¶10

W.P.(C) 4803/2018

¶11

Page 1 of 2

¶12

A perusal of the appeal filed by the petitioner reveals that though he had made an effort to explain that he had been undergoing severe depression because of loss of employment, no medical documents in support of the said averments were enclosed therewith.

¶13

We deem it appropriate to dispose of the present petition with liberty granted to the petitioner to submit all the medical documents relating to his ailment and treatment in support of the averments made by him in the statutory appeal, which shall be considered by the Appellate Authority and a fresh speaking order shall be passed thereafter.

¶14

In view of the order passed above, the order dated 01.06.2017 is quashed and set aside. The petitioner is granted liberty to file the said documents with the relevant records within four weeks. The respondents shall place the said appeal before the Appellate Authority alongwith the medical records that the petitioner shall submit, which shall be examined and a speaking order passed on merits within eight weeks thereafter, under written intimation to the petitioner.

¶15

If the grievance of the petitioner still survives, he shall be entitled to seek legal recourse, as may be advised.

¶16

The present petition is disposed of alongwith the pending application.

HIMA KOHLI, J

REKHA PALLI, J

JULY 09, 2018 na

Page 2 of 2

W.P.(C) 4803/2018

Const. Veramani T v. Ministry of Home Affairs & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Const. Veramani T v. Ministry of Home Affairs & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amit Kumar Vs South Delhi M.C.D. through D.C.M.C.D Green Park and Ors.

D.K.Kaushik Vs B.S.E.S. & Anr.

S.P.Garg Vs Syndicate Bank

Paresh Nath Sharma Vs UOI & Ors.

Pramod Vs Cement Corporation of India (Cci)

Shaik Riaz Ahmed Vs Fiitjee Ltd. & Ors.

Anil Kumar Gupta & Ors. Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr.

Vishal Tokas Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Anuradha Dhaul and Anr. Vs Directorate of Estate and Anr.

Ex. Constable (Driver) Shyam Sunder No. 271/SB Vs Lt. Governer, Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Ramesh Singh & Anr. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Jatinder Kumar Popli Vs Ashok Kumar Popli

Jatinder Kumar Popli Vs Rajiv Popli & Ors.

Ex. Hc/Gd Suraj Bhan Vs Union of India and Ors.