The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition and accompanying application as infructuous after the respondent submitted that dues had been cleared and no outstanding amount remained against them.
Writ petition and accompanying application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes with Mr. Arnav Vidyarthi and Ms. Anju Thomas, Advocates.
versus
SAMIR PRADHAN ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Vipra Bhardwaj, Advocate with Respondent in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent submits that in pursuant to the inspection dated 12.06.2009 and amount of Rs.58,438/- has been paid and no dues remained against the respondent till 21.02.2017.
Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner does dispute the submissions made by the counsel for the respondent and submits that nothing remained in the present petition. The same has been rendered infructuous.
Accordingly, this writ petition and the accompanying application is dismissed as infructuous.
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J
NOVEMBER 16, 2018 rd
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is to be dismissed as infructuous after payment of dues.
BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD
SAMIR PRADHAN
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
