Petitioner sought directions to his daughter-in-law to release his salary and retirement dues. The court held that as the petitioner had unconditionally withdrawn a previous petition on the same facts, he was precluded from filing a fresh one on the same cause of action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9
Through Mr.Sandiv Kalia with Ms.Reena Rao and Nannd Ram, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondent Through Ms.Abha Malhotra, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI
O R D E R
% 03.07.2018
HIMA KOHLI, J
REKHA PALLI, J
JULY 03, 2018/ sr
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a petitioner who had unconditionally withdrawn a previous writ petition on the same cause of action is barred from filing a fresh petition.
Jaipal Singh
Union of India and Ors.
Hima Kohli
Rekha Palli
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
