This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~29
DEEWANSHI VATS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vishal Singh and Ms.Jyoti Kataria Bajaj, Advs.
versus
UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. with Mr. Pranag Newmai and Ms. Shomita Rai, Advs. for R-1
Mr. Amit Bansal, Adv. with Ms.Seema Dolo, Adv. for R-2
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R
% 16.11.2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
NOVEMBER 16, 2018 dsn
Deewanshi Vats
University of Delhi
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
