This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~26
GEETA SHARMA AND ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mrs. Kajal Chandra, Adv. with Mr.P. Chopra, Adv.
versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS.
..... Respondents Through: Ms.Shagwfa Salim, Adv. for Mr. Sumit Chander, Adv. for R-3 Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for L & B, GNCTD with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR O R D E R % 16.11.2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she wishes to withdraw this writ petition, as her grievance therein stands satisfied. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
NOVEMBER 16, 2018 dsn
Geeta Sharma and Anr.
Delhi Development Authority and Ors.
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
