Hari Nath Ram v. NCT of Delhi & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Hon'ble Court dismissed two writ petitions declaring the issues public raised therein as already over, rendering the petitions infructuous.
What did the court decide?
Writ petitions and applications are dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
What the court decided
Signature Not Verified Signed By:RAM DATT Signing Date:15.10.2024 16:42 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file an d no page is missing.
Mr. Naushad Ahmad Kha, ASC (Civil), GNCTD. Mr. Shadan Farasat, ASC with Mr. Ahmad Said, Adv. forR-2. Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Adv. for R-3&4. Mr. Ajay Verma and Mr. Ishaan Verma, Advs. for R- 5.
- W.P.(C) 6637/2018 & CM No.25309/2018
VIJENDER GUPTA AND ORS Petitioners Through : Mr. Himanshu Pathak, Adv.
versus
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .... Respondents Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Satyakam, ASCforR-l&2. Mr. Ripu Daman . S. Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Sushil Kumar Pandey, Mr. T.P. Singh and Mr. Abhishek Tiwari, Advs. for R-3
W.P.(C) 6676/2018 i& CM No.25403/2018
.1^ ' PRASHANTMANCPIANDA Petitioner Through : Petitioner in person.
versus
LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR & ORS Respondents Through : Mr. Aman Lekhi, ASG with
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
VIJENDER GUPTA AND ORS
- petitioner
PRASHANTMANCPIANDA
- respondent
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS
- respondent
LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR & ORS
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court