The petitioner sought withdraw a writ petition challenging restrictions on married females applying for Judge Advocate General posts. The court allowed withdrawal with liberty to challenge fresh instructions prohibiting married men.
Withdrawal of the petition with liberty to raise challenge afresh to the instructions and corrigendum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
KUSH KALRA ..... Petitioner Through : Dr.Charu Walikhanna with Mr.Dharmendra Singh Pal, Advocates. Mr.Gautam Narayan, amicus curiae with Ms.Mahamaya Chatterjee, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR
..... Respondents Through : Mr.Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr.Waize Ali Noor, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
%
O R D E R 01.08.2018
W.P.(C) 3915/2016
Page 1 of 2
Copy of the order be given dasti to the learned counsel for the parties.
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J.
AUGUST 01, 2018
sa
W.P.(C) 3915/2016
Page 2 of 2
KUSH KALRA
UNION OF INDIA
C.HARI SHANKAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
