Petitioner sought quashing of cancel notice and permission for channel uplink. Counsel assured compliance. Respondent assured decision within two weeks. Court dismissed petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach Court if cause arises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~7
ALLIANCE STRATEGIES LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Kirti Uppal, Senior Counsel with Ms Madhumita and Mr Vidur, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr Anil Soni, CGSC with Mr Abhinav Tyagi, Advocate for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % 06.07.2018
under:-
the decision in this regard would be taken and communicated to the petitioner within a period of two weeks from today.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
JULY 06, 2018 RK
ALLIANCE STRATEGIES LTD
UNION OF INDIA
VIBHU BAKHRU
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
