Abhishek Kadyan & Ors. v. University of Dlehi & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
ABHISHEK KADYAN & ORS ..... Petitioners
Through None
versus
UNIVERSITY OF DLEHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Mohinder JS Rupal and Mr. Prang Newmai and Ms. Slomita Rai, Advocates for R-1
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL O R D E R
% 03.10.2018 CM APPL. 33272/2018 (Stay)
None appears on behalf of the applicants/petitioners.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.1
states that, the application has been rendered infructuous.
Be that as it may, since none appears on behalf of the applicants/petitioners, the present application is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution and disposed of accordingly.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
OCTOBER 03, 2018 as
Abhishek Kadyan
University of Delhi
Siddharth Mridul
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court