Petitioner sought writ for mandatory hospitalization of his son with psychiatric and drug dependence at IHBAS. Court considered Medical Board opinion stating no further hospitalization needed. Rejected petition and permitted discharge.
Permission granted to institute to discharge the petitioner's son.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~15
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NARENDRA KUMAR VEER ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Paranjay Chopra and Mr Kunal Sharma, Advocates.
versus
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Anupam Srivasta, ASC, GNCTD with Mr Dhairya Gupta, Advocate for R-1. Mr Rahul Singh and Ms Meenu Singh, Advocates for respondent.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R
% 10.07.2018
under:-
Act, 2017.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
JULY 10, 2018 MK
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's son requires continued hospitalization for treatment.
Whether appropriate directions can be issued to the Government for framing guidelines for similar patients.
Whether the institute can discharge the patient based on the Medical Board's opinion.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
NARENDRA KUMAR VEER
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
INSTITUTE OF HUMAN BEHAVIOR AND ALLIED SCIENCES
VIBHU BAKHRU
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
