passed by the Division Bench dated 3rd November, 2008 read with and as modified vide order dated 28th July, 2010. They cannot claim any further or additional right. Unfortunately, for the present petitioners, during the pendency of the litigation, there has been a change of policy of the Delhi Development Authority, vide notification dated 13th September, 2012 pursuant to the decision of the Lieutenant Governor. New policy states that utilization of additional FAR in group housing societies shall be approved for construction of additional tower/block and shall not be utilized for additional construction on the existing structure, as this would compromise with the structure safety of the existing building and risk living inhabitants. Society would have to comply with and additional construction has to be as per the Notification. To a large extent, the petitioners are themselves responsible, as in-spite of favourable order dated 3rd November, 2008 read with order dated 28th July, 2010, they are continued with the litigation. This imprudence, was adversely commented upon by the Supreme Court in their order dated 3rd May, 2018, observing that the High Court had done complete justice and the applicants therein had dragged the matter unnecessarily for last seven years. 14. The petitioners have now raised the plea and claim that as per verification exercise undertaken by the Registrar/Administrator, there are only fifty four genuine members. We do not find any merit in the said contention. We may note that pursuant to the directions issued by the High Court for elections, verification exercise was undertaken by the
