Petitioners filed a writ petition fearing removal. The petitioners sought to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the Court again. The Court granted the withdrawal.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach this Court again, as prayed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
versus
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPRATION AND ANR
..... Respondents Through: Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Standing Counsel for SDMC with Mr.Shashi Gupta, Advocate. Mr.Devvrat, Advocate for GNCTD.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
O R D E R % 02.04.2018
Four petitioners have approached this Court under the fear of their removal.
After some hearing, counsel for the petitioners wishes to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach this Court again, in case of any grievance.
The present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed.
G. S. SISTANI, J
SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J
APRIL 02, 2018 afa
Riyajuddin And Ors
South Delhi Municipal Corpration And Anr
G. S. Sistani
Sangita Dhingra Sehgal
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
