The High Court of Delhi dismissed a writ petition and connected contempt/complaint numbers as withdrawn by the learned counsel for the petitioner, granting liberty to seek appropriate remedies legally available.
The petition and connected CM No. 11587/2018 were dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to seek other remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
versus
NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Sriharsha Peechara, Standing Counsel for NDMC with Mr.Rajender Yadav and Ms.Vidhi Jain, Advocates.
Ms.Anam Ahmad, Adv. for Ms.Isha Khanna, Advocate for R-3/SHO.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL O R D E R
% 23.03.2018
After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he wishes to withdraw the present petition.
The present petition along with CM No.11587/2018 is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to seek such remedy as available in accordance with law.
G. S. SISTANI, J
SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J
MARCH 23, 2018 afa
Mahesh Kumar Yadav
New Delhi Municipal Council
Isha Khanna
G.S. Sistani
Sangita Dhingra Sehgal
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
