The Delhi High Court granted the petitioner's request for permission to withdraw the writ petition and dismissed it as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw; Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~41
Through Mr. Ankur Sangal and Ms. Sucheta Roy, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through Ms. Shilpi Jain Sharma and Mr. Mukul Sharma, Adv. for R-3
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
O R D E R % 16.11.2018
Counsel for the petitioner on instructions seeks permission to withdraw this petition.
Permission granted.
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J
NOVEMBER 16, 2018 gb
M/S TAEGUTEC LIMITED
UNION OF INDIA
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
