The Court disposed of writ petitions challenging recovery notices without addressing jurisdictional objections or limitation, noting such issues can be raised if fresh notices are issued. The withdrawal of notices did not prejudice the respondents' rights.
Present petitions disposed of; liberty granted to revive if occasion arises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified Signed By:RAM DATT Signing Date:18.10.2024 16:15 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file an d no page is missing.
M/s Cummins Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India and Ors.: SLP(C) No. 28830/2017. He states that the question whether the SFIS Scheme would apply to Indian companies selling their services under allegedly foreign brands, is a subject matter of consideration before the Supreme Court.
V
V
V
/
^
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
NOVEMBER 15, 2018 pkv
, /
2 issues framed by the court
Whether recovery notices barring limitation and jurisdictional issues are maintainable.
Whether withdrawal of recovery notices is without prejudice to the right to issue fresh notices.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s Cummins Technologies India Pvt. Ltd.
Union of India
VIBHU BAKHRU
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
