In Surendra Kumar v University of Delhi, the petitioner instructed counsel not to press the petition. The High Court of Delhi dismissed the writ petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
MONTY KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Vijay Kasana, Adv. with petitioner in person.
versus
UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr.Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. with Mr.Prang Newmai, Adv. & Ms.Slomita Rai, Adv. for University of Delhi.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI
Pursuant to the last order, Mr.Rupal has produced the original record. The same has been shown to learned counsel for the petitioner as also to the petitioner in Court and after examining the said record, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has instructions not to press the present petition.
The petition and application are dismissed as not pressed.
REKHA PALLI, J
MAY 11, 2018/aa
Monty Kumar
University of Delhi
Rekha Palli
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
