This order records the receipt of an application for restoration of a writ petition. No substantive decision on restoration, merits, or legal principles was delivered in this excerpt. Notice was issued for reply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~23
YR NALIN KUMAR SHASTREE ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Manjula Gupta and Ms. Gitanjali N. Sharma, Advocates
versus
GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPASTHA & ORS. ..Respondents Through: Nemo
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
O R D E R
% 02.05.2018
C.M.17918/2018
By way of this application, restoration of the writ petition is sought.
Notice of this application be issued to respondents by speed post, returnable for 16th August, 2018. Affidavit of service alongwith tracking report be filed.
SUNIL GAUR, J
MAY 02, 2018
s
YR NALIN KUMAR SHASTREE
GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPASTHA
SUNIL GAUR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
