Dismissed
Amit Kumar v. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/3628/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~30
AMIT KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, Ms. Priyanka Anand &Mr. Kamlesh Anand, Advocates
Versus DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Nemo.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
O R D E R % 13.04.2018
At the outset, learned counsel for petitioner fairly states that the remedy against the impugned order lies before the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), New Delhi and seeks permission of the Court to withdraw this petition to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), New Delhi.
In view of aforesaid, this petition and application are dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as aforesaid, while leaving the question of limitation open.
SUNIL GAUR, J
APRIL 13, 2018 r
Amit Kumar
Delhi Metro Rail Corporation
Sunil Gaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court