Disposed

Vijay Kapoor v. the Commissioner M C D Town Hall Delhi and Ors.

Delhi HC19 Feb 2018W.P.(C)/4178/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ petition which stood disposed of after personal appearance in an unauthorised construction case, he expressed satisfaction with demolition action taken by respondents and chose not to pursue the petition further.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of as petitioner expressed satisfaction with demolition action and did not wish to pursue it further.

Vijay Kapoor Vs the Commissioner M C D Town Hall… — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~25

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 4178/2017

¶4

VIJAY KAPOOR ..... Petitioner

¶5

Through: Petitioner in person.

¶6

versus

¶7

THE COMMISSIONER M C D TOWN HALL DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents

¶8

Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Standing Counsel for R1 & R2 Ms. Seema Singh, Adv. for R3

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

% 19.02.2018

¶12

CM No. 6682/2018 (for exemption from personal appearance)

¶13

An application has been filed by Mr. Mukesh Gupta, learned Standing

¶14

Counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 seeking exemption from appearance of

¶15

Chief Engineer Mr. Sanjay Jain, Karol Bagh Zone North MCD in the court

¶16

today. The same is taken on record and has since been numbered. The relevant averments are made in para 4 of the application, which reads as under:

¶17

“4. That Mr. Sanjay Jain, the concerned Chief Engineer (Karol Bagh Zone), is not well and is on leave and is thus unable to appear before this Hon’ble Court on 19.02.2018.”

¶18

For the reasons stated in the application, Mr. Sanjay Jain is exempted

¶19

from appearance today. The application stands disposed of.

¶20

W.P.(C) 4178/2017

¶21

The status report has been filed in the Court. The same is taken on

¶22

record. In pages 4 and 5 the status report read as under:

¶23

“ That the North DMC has also initiated action against the unauthorised construction of fourth floor entire in this property (rest of the building is old and occupied) under section 313 and 344 of DMC Act, 1957 vide file No.B/UC/KBZ/2017/120 dt. 29.05.2017. The demolition order in respect of said unauthorised construction was also passed on 07.06.2016.

¶24

It is further submitted that the department has taken a demolition action this property on 09.02.2018 with the assistance of police force from P.S. Rajinder Nagar. In this action the entire fourth floor has been demolished and made it unusable. The photographs of the Property No.35/15, Old Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi before and after demolition action are annexed herewith as Annexure R-1/1(Colly).”

¶25

The photographs have been annexed with the status report. The petitioner, who appears in person has been given a copy of the status report. He states that he is satisfied with the action taken by the respondent No.1

¶26

and does not wish to pursue the petition any further. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶27

V. KAMESWAR RAO, J

¶28

FEBRUARY 19, 2018 /aky

Vijay Kapoor v. the Commissioner M C D Town Hall Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Kapoor v. the Commissioner M C D Town Hall Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Balwant Singh Vs Union of India and Ors.

Mahendar Singh Vs Government of NCT of Delhi through the Secretary and Anr.

M/S Impressions Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs Virender Kumar

Neeraj Pant Vs Public Work Department & Ors.

Bache Singh & Ors. Vs Delhi High Court

D B Corp. Ltd. Vs Government of N.C.T. Delhi and Ors.

D B Corp. Ltd. Vs Government of N.C.T. Delhi and Ors.

Parveen Sharma Vs the Chairman, Ndmc & Ors.

Sukhbir Sharma Vs Uday Pratap Singh and Ors.

Vijay Gupta Vs Vikram Singh Khari and Ors.

Seema Devi Vs Commissioner of Transport Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Dr R N Gupta Technical Educational Society Vs Santosh Sharma and Anr.

Natwar Lal Vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

Ritesh Kumar Vs Tata Power Delhi Distribution Limited