The petitioner sought withdrawal of the writ petition. The High Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as well as a connected application for exemption upon request.
Withdrawal of the petition allowed; petition and connected application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~46
versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Arjun Pant, Adv. for DDA. Mr. Tushar Sannu, Adv. for EDMC. Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel with Ms. Anushruti, Adv. for R3. Mr. Rahul Sharma and Mr. C.K. Bhatta, Advs. for UOI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO O R D E R % 19.02.2018
CM No. 6300/2018 (for exemption)
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 1534/2018 and CM No. 6299/2018 (for directions)
After some submissions, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition.
The petition and the connected application are dismissed as withdrawn.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
FEBRUARY 19, 2018 /jg
NATWAR LAL
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
