This order records the dismissal of a petition under Section 9 due to withdrawal. The petitioner intended to pursue an application under Section 17 before the arbitrator after appointment.
Petition under Section 9 dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue application under Section 17 before arbitrator.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~26
PRERNA MARKETING PVT. LTD.
..... Petitioner Through : Mr.Sandeep Singh Hora, Adv.
versus
INDIA TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED & ANR.
..... Respondents Through : Mr.Anitesh Sharma, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA
O R D E R % 06.02.2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits the arbitrator has been appointed in the matter and he has filed an application under Section 17 of the Act before the arbitrator and as such intends to withdraw the petition under section 9 pending before this Court. In the circumstances, the petition under Section 9 stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to learned counsel for the petitioner to pursue application under Section 17 of the Act before the arbitrator.
YOGESH KHANNA, J
FEBRUARY 06, 2018 VLD
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition under Section 9 stands dismissed as withdrawn.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Prerna Marketing Pvt. Ltd.
India Tourism Development Corporation Limited
Yogesh Khanna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
