Allowed
Hari Om Bhatia v. the Central Registrar & Anr.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/3640/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~50
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
HARI OM BHATIA ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Pankaj Bhatia, Mr. Dhruv Surana, Mr. Nipun Goel, Mr. Ashish Chaudhary and Mr. Rabindra Nanda, Advs.
versus
THE CENTRAL REGISTRAR & ANR .... Respondents Through : Mr. Sarat Chandra, Adv. for R-1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
O R D E R % 13.04.2018
CM No.14452/2018
W.P.(C) 3640/2018 & CM No.14451/2018
2.1 Mr. Chandra, who appears on advance notice, informs me that he has instructions to the effect that respondent no.2 has withdrawn himself from the arbitration.
2.2 Mr. Chandra says that therefore, the petition has been rendered infructuous. Furthermore, learned counsel submits that a new Arbitrator would be appointed bearing in mind the provisions of the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, 1996.
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
APRIL 13, 2018 mk
HARI OM BHATIA
THE CENTRAL REGISTRAR & ANR
RAJIV SHAKDHER
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court