Petition declared infructuous as respondent No. 2 indicated it would not encash the bank guarantee pending case disposal; petition disposed of without any relief.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr.Buddy Ranganadhan, Ms.Sayaree Basu Malllik, Ms.Surabhi Limaye and Ms.Aanchal, Arora, Advs.
versus
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
O R D E R
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
APRIL 13, 2018 neelam
RAJASTHAN SUN TECHNIQUE ENERGY PVT. LTD.
UNION OF INDIA
R-2
RAJIV SHAKDHER
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
