Learned counsel for the petitioners informed the court that the prayed relief became infructuous as the impugned order had already been uploaded. Consequently, the petition did not proceed. It was disposed of without further proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~54
DIJO MATHEW AND ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Azeem Samuel, Adv.
versus
INSURANCE REGULATORY AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Dipak K. Nag, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
O R D E R % 07.05.2018 CM APP No. 18793/2018
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
MAY 07, 2018/ak
Dijo Mathew And Ors
Insurance Regulatory And Development Authority Of India
Rajiv Shakdher
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
