Allowed
Vivek Kamboj v. Registrar of Companies (Roc) & Anr.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/3079/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~75
..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Mohit for Mr.Siddharth Yadav, Adv.
versus
REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES & ANR
..... Respondents Through Ms. Suparna Srivastava, Adv for the UOI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
O R D E R
% 30.05.2018
C.M. Appl. No. 23847/2018
C.M. Appl. No. 23837/2018
2 Ms. Srivastava accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents.
3 In view of the limited relief sought for in the application, learned counsel says that she does not wish to file a reply.
4 The relief claimed in the application is as follows:- “A. Extend the time for deposit of Fixed Deposit Receipt(FDR) granted to the petitioner till June 2, 2018;”
5 Accordingly, for the reasons given in the application, the petitioner is given time to file the original FDR in consonance with the directions of this Court passed vide order dated 25.04.2018 by tomorrow i.e. 31.05.2018.
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
MAY 30, 2018
A
Vivek Kamboj
Registrar of Companies
Rajiv Shakdher
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court