The petitioners sought to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to implead in W.P.(C) 195/2010. The Court allowed condonation of delay in filing counter affidavit and then dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
Condonation of delay allowed; Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~23
OM PARKASH AND ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Rahul Mehra with Mr. Chaitanya Gosain, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vikram Jetly, CGSC for R-1 Mr. Ruchir Mishra with Mr. Mukesh Kr. Tiwari & Mr. Abhishek Rana, Advs. for R-3 Ms. Shalini Kaul with Mr. Jayant Kumar, Advs. for R-2 & R-4
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO O R D E R % 01.10.2018
CM APPL.35689/2018 (delay in filing counter affidavit)
For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 26 days in filing the counter affidavit is condoned. Counter affidavit is taken on record.
The application is allowed.
W.P.(C) 3146/2018 & CM APPL.12514/2018 (direction)
Learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to seek impleadment in W.P. (C) 195/2010 which is pending consideration before a coordinate Bench of this Court.
The writ petition along with the pending application is dismissed as withdrawn. In case the plea for impleadment is maintainable, the same
would be considered by the Court where the matter is pending.
CHIEF JUSTICE
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J OCTOBER 01, 2018 /ns
OM PARKASH AND ANR.
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
