Allowed

Shri Balaji College of Edcation v. Nationaal Council for Teacher Education and Ors.

Delhi HC16 Mar 2018W.P.(C)/2520/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging the rejection of an application for B.Ed. course admission. Court directed respondents to reconsider the application, ignoring the State of Haryana ban, within twelve weeks.

What did the court decide?

Reconsideration of the application for B.Ed. admission directed within twelve weeks; rejection on ground of State ban held unsustainable; deposit of Rs.15,000 with Staff Welfare Fund.

Shri Balaji College of Edcation Vs Nationaal Council… — Education and Admissions | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~51

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 2520/2018

¶4

SHRI BALAJI COLLEGE OF EDUCATION ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Sanjay Sharawat, Adv.

¶5

versus

¶6

NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Monika Arora, Adv.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI

¶8

O R D E R

¶9

% 16.03.2018

¶10

Vide present petition, the petitioner-Institute has prayed for a direction to the respondents to reconsider its application dated 29.12.2012 for grant of admission to conduct B.Ed. course which was returned unactioned by the respondent No.2 vide its letter dated 26.06.2013. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the said application was returned only on the ground of ban imposed by the State of Haryana.

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the said application was returned only on the ground of the ban imposed by the State of Haryana for opening of new institutes for the B.Ed. course during that period.

¶12

Issue notice. Ms.Monika Arora, Advocate who appears on advance notice for the respondents fairly submits that the respondents

¶13

have taken a decision to process all the applications which were submitted by the Institutes before the imposition of the ban by the State Government.

¶14

Learned counsel for the respondent, however, submits that keeping in view the fact that the petitioner’s application was returned over 4 years ago, the respondents may be given adequate time to examine and process the same as per law.

¶15

Subject to petitioner’s depositing Rs.15,000/- with Delhi High Court Staff Welfare Fund, the writ petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to reconsider the petitioner’s application dated 29.12.2012 subject to the petitioner meeting all other prescribed eligibility criteria and dispose of the same by passing a reasoned and speaking order within twelve weeks from today. It is made clear that the petitioner’s application would not be rejected on the ground of there being a ban imposed by the State of Haryana for opening of such educational Institutions.

¶16

The petition stands disposed of with the above directions.

¶17

DASTI.

¶18

REKHA PALLI, J

¶19

MARCH 16, 2018 gm

Shri Balaji College of Edcation v. Nationaal Council for Teacher Education and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri Balaji College of Edcation v. Nationaal Council for Teacher Education and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deepika Anand Vs Directorate of Edcuation, Delhi & Ors.

Sunny Gupta Vs Union of India and Anr.

Deepak Khosla Vs Registrar General, High Court of Delhi & Ors.

Rosy Blue India Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Vs Union of India through Joint Secretary & Anr.

Experion Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.

Yogendra Mittal Vs Union of India & Anr.

Jagdish Kumar Koli Vs National Bal Bhavan & Anr.

Subhash Saini and Anr. Vs Surat Singh Saini

Nikhil Sharma Vs Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University and Anr.

Mohd Asif and Ors. Vs Kulachi Hansraj Model School & Ors.

Rishav Jha Vs Central Board of Secondary Education and Anr.

Khan Mohammed Khalid Vs Jay Karan Singh & Ors.

M. Avais Musvee Vs Jay Karan Singh Jt. Director General of Foreign Trade and Ors.

Master Aditya Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.