Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a writ petition and file a representation. The Court directed respondents to consider the representation expeditiously and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~42
KULACHI HANSRAJ MODEL SCHOOL & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr.Jawahar Raja, ASC for R-2-4. Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal, S.C. for DDA.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI
O R D E R
% 14.03.2018
After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner concedes that the petitioners have not made any representation to the respondent nos. 4 & 5. He seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the present petition and to file an appropriate representation to respondent nos. 4 & 5 within two weeks. He however, prays that respondents be directed to decide his representation expeditiously.
It is accordingly directed that in case, the petitioner makes a representation to the aforesaid respondents within a period of two weeks, the same shall be considered on its own merit by the respondents by passing a reasoned and speaking order within four weeks.
Needless to say that, in case, the petitioners are still aggrieved by the decision of respondent nos. 4 & 5, it will be open to them to take legal recourse permissible under law.
The writ petition alongwith pending applications is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid direction.
REKHA PALLI, J
MARCH 14, 2018/ sr
MOHD ASIF AND ORS
KULACHI HANSRAJ MODEL SCHOOL
DDA
Rekha Palli
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
