Petitioner sought continuation of an interim order pending appeal before NCLT. The court found the interim order remained in force and disposed of the petition without further orders.
None. Petition disposed of as interim order remained operative.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~24
PUJA TANDON AND ANR. ..... Petitioners
Through Ms Ghauru Tyagi, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr T.P. Singh, Advocate UOI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R
% 03.12.2018
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
DECEMBER 03, 2018/ pkv
1 provisions across 1 enactments
PUJA TANDON AND ANR.
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
VIBHU BAKHRU
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
