This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~47
GROUP CAPTAIN R.S. CHHATWAL(RETD.)..... Petitioner Through: Mr.R.K. Sharma, Adv.
versus
SRI SURU NANK SATSANG SABHA, VASANT VIHAR AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI
O R D E R % 13.03.2018
Since none appears for respondent No.2, Mr.Satyakam, ASC who is present in Court, is requested to assist this Court. At the first call, Mr.Satyakam seeks pass over to get appropriate instructions. The matter has now been taken up after a pass over.
Mr.Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the petitioner has not moved a representation to any of the authorities and therefore, seeks leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to move a representation or take appropriate steps, as may be permissible under law. Liberty as prayed for is granted.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The pending application also stands disposed of.
REKHA PALLI, J
MARCH 13, 2018/ gm
GROUP CAPTAIN R.S. CHHATWAL(RETD.)
SRI SURU NANK SATSANG SABHA, VASANT VIHAR
ANR.
Rekha Palli
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
