Petitioner was granted liberty to move an application for the next academic year if needed. The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Liberty granted to move an appropriate application in the next academic year if the need arises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~41
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondent Through Mr.Bhagvan Swarup Shukla with Mr.Kamaldeep, Advs for UOI. Mr.Atul Kumar, Adv for R-2 & 3.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI
O R D E R
% 20.03.2018
After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since his entire case was based on a decision of Punjab and Haryana High Court, which has not been implemented for the present academic year, he does not wish to press the present petition. He, however, seeks liberty to move an appropriate application before the respondents, in case, the need so arises for the next academic year. In case the petitioner moves such an application in the next academic year, the respondents will take a considered decision on the same by keeping in view all the relevant factors.
Liberty as sought for by the learned counsel for the petitioner is granted.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
REKHA PALLI, J
MARCH 20, 2018/ sr
Ayush N. Chandar
Union of India
Rekha Palli
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
